View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0001490||SUMo||New Feature||public||2012-02-26 10:18||2012-06-17 09:47|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version||3.2|
|Summary||0001490: Re-focus Error Log.|
When doing a fresh scan - SUMo generates a list for "Unable to load the following files".
For my own purposes - this list provides far too much information, so it becomes hard to identify which applications do not correctly support the Version information resource that SUMo uses.
Specifically I would like *OPTION* to exclude the following
| Installer / Uninstaller
| Microsoft product support disabled
| Rejected by name filter
What is actually useful (to petition developers to correctly use Version Resources against their app executables) is
| Empty / Invalid version
When the filename isn't one of:
etc (you know the list)
A suggestion to implement this in a more usable way - generate each of the reports (as you currently do) - but put the output for each section (Installer/Uninstaller -- Microsoft Product support disabled -- Rejected by name filter etc) onto a separate TAB. (or at the least - sort the report based on the categories - grouping each section *together* - ie. "Rejected by name filter")
This would allow users to just view the section of data they are interested in (specifically, which applications do not provide version information) - so they can request that this situation is rectified by app developers.
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|2012-02-26 10:18||BuBBy||New Issue|
|2012-02-26 11:50||Kyle_Katarn||Assigned To||=> Kyle_Katarn|
|2012-02-26 11:50||Kyle_Katarn||Status||new => acknowledged|
|2012-06-17 09:47||Kyle_Katarn||Status||acknowledged => resolved|
|2012-06-17 09:47||Kyle_Katarn||Fixed in Version||=> 3.2|
|2012-06-17 09:47||Kyle_Katarn||Resolution||open => fixed|