0000520: Add "Rename" or "Nickname" Support for Product Entries

(0000491)
emilsekula (reporter)
2009-01-21 12:43

Yes. I am agree. It could be nice option.

(0000500)
FrankZA (reporter)
2009-03-04 14:36

I too agree. I think this would also yield better results in the searches for some software.

(0000501)
Kyle_Katarn (administrator)
2009-03-04 22:31

OK

(0000903)
poutnikg (reporter)
2012-06-25 20:30

I have just wanted to add such a request too.

(0000904)
Kyle_Katarn (administrator)
2012-06-25 22:03

OK

(0001122)
poutnikg (reporter)
2012-08-17 08:50

It would be used for sorting and displaying customized Product + Vendor items,
internally still using used current product info.

The reason why to use it:

- Vendor is known, but the field is empty
- Product or vendor string is incorrect, misspelled
- Product or vendor string is misleading or simply wrong
- User wants to use its own item grouping

(0001128)
bytehead (updater)
2012-08-17 18:42

Not a bad idea at all.

(0001132)
Kyle_Katarn (administrator)
2012-08-18 01:00

Not a bad idea at all.... but not so easy :)

Of course such "customization" would be "limited" to client side, server would still work on "raw data"

(0001134)
bytehead (updater)
2012-08-18 01:17

Well, we're not here to make only easy ideas, Kyle :)

(0001135)
Kyle_Katarn (administrator)
2012-08-18 01:26

I know :)

To be serious, thank you for this professional-class support & idea. You do a great part of the job !

(0001142)
bytehead (updater)
2012-08-18 14:46

You're welcome, Kyle!

(0001155)
poutnikg (reporter)
2012-08-18 17:32

> Of course such "customization" would be "limited" to client side,
> server would still work on "raw data"

That what I mean, it has local importance to end user.
Part of SUMO customization.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2008-03-23 21:07	Zer0 Voltage	New Issue
2008-03-23 21:16	Zer0 Voltage	Note Added: 0000220
2008-03-24 10:14	Kyle_Katarn	Description Updated
2008-03-24 10:14	Kyle_Katarn	Note Deleted: 0000220
2008-03-24 10:14	Kyle_Katarn	Assigned To	=> Kyle_Katarn
2008-03-24 10:14	Kyle_Katarn	Status	new => acknowledged
2009-01-21 12:43	emilsekula	Note Added: 0000491
2009-01-21 22:43	Kyle_Katarn	Relationship added	has duplicate 0000968
2009-01-21 22:43	Kyle_Katarn	Relationship added	has duplicate 0000967
2009-03-04 14:36	FrankZA	Note Added: 0000500
2009-03-04 22:31	Kyle_Katarn	Note Added: 0000501
2012-06-25 20:30	poutnikg	Note Added: 0000903
2012-06-25 22:03	Kyle_Katarn	Note Added: 0000904
2012-08-17 08:50	poutnikg	Note Added: 0001122
2012-08-17 18:42	bytehead	Note Added: 0001128
2012-08-18 01:00	Kyle_Katarn	Note Added: 0001132
2012-08-18 01:17	bytehead	Note Added: 0001134
2012-08-18 01:26	Kyle_Katarn	Note Added: 0001135
2012-08-18 14:46	bytehead	Note Added: 0001142
2012-08-18 17:32	poutnikg	Note Added: 0001155

Notes
(0000491) emilsekula (reporter) 2009-01-21 12:43	Yes. I am agree. It could be nice option.

(0000500) FrankZA (reporter) 2009-03-04 14:36	I too agree. I think this would also yield better results in the searches for some software.

(0000501) Kyle_Katarn (administrator) 2009-03-04 22:31	OK

(0000903) poutnikg (reporter) 2012-06-25 20:30	I have just wanted to add such a request too.

(0000904) Kyle_Katarn (administrator) 2012-06-25 22:03	OK

(0001122) poutnikg (reporter) 2012-08-17 08:50	It would be used for sorting and displaying customized Product + Vendor items, internally still using used current product info. The reason why to use it: - Vendor is known, but the field is empty - Product or vendor string is incorrect, misspelled - Product or vendor string is misleading or simply wrong - User wants to use its own item grouping

(0001128) bytehead (updater) 2012-08-17 18:42	Not a bad idea at all.

(0001132) Kyle_Katarn (administrator) 2012-08-18 01:00	Not a bad idea at all.... but not so easy :) Of course such "customization" would be "limited" to client side, server would still work on "raw data"

(0001134) bytehead (updater) 2012-08-18 01:17	Well, we're not here to make only easy ideas, Kyle :)

(0001135) Kyle_Katarn (administrator) 2012-08-18 01:26	I know :) To be serious, thank you for this professional-class support & idea. You do a great part of the job !

(0001142) bytehead (updater) 2012-08-18 14:46	You're welcome, Kyle!

(0001155) poutnikg (reporter) 2012-08-18 17:32	> Of course such "customization" would be "limited" to client side, > server would still work on "raw data" That what I mean, it has local importance to end user. Part of SUMO customization.